The sharpest argument is the one that leaves nothing left to say.
Tax litigation begins with silence. A judge, a file, and the quiet authority of written advocacy. What matters then is not how much you say, but how clearly you articulate your thoughts. Facts must unfold, not be narrated. The goal is to render the opposing case untenable through strategic framing and substantiation.
To dispute well is to do more than answer. It is to rebuild the ground on which the answer stands. Our arguments are valued for their precision and internal coherence. They settle into a structure chiseled with intent, a path laid for thought to follow. Each submission is conceived as a line of reasoning: not a sequence of sections, but a continuous progression — from context to confrontation, from law to conclusion.
Our approach aims to preserve structure, reputation, and alignment with long-term strategy.
Extensive track record of resolving cases pre-litigation through strategic negotiation. Cumulative experience, before and since the foundation of LS2P Avocats.
Where you stand often depends on how you start.
Schedule a Consultation